i am actually hoping somebody else (maybe another PRA / PRI) will interact with this as well рџЉ i believe you are making good and really essential points, and there could well be a need for the IET to, firstly, make sure that the review panels for expert registration may be shown to have credibility in neuro-scientific contemporary computer computer computer computer software development and, secondly, be more proactive in selling expert registration to software employers. Maybe maybe maybe Not necessarily a great deal being a way of measuring technical competence, but as being a way of measuring expert competence. (Note before some body shouts at me personally: I’m not suggesting that the PRIs aren’t competent to take into account the prospects in the manner George indicates, but i could completely think that there is certainly a concern over whether or not they have emerged because of the wider computer software industry to own that competence.)
Please do not cancel your account – it really is those who will make the arguments precisely that the IET needs as you have just made them.
We’d wager it is that, in addition to the general newness for the industry, which explains why engineering professionalism never actually made great inroads to the software industry that is pure.
That is a fascinating subject by itself – we suspect there is a complete PhD thesis in why the program industry is where it really is when compared with other areas of engineering. But i am going to state which in fact registration that is professionaln’t made great inroads into any part of engineering innovation and development (that is quite definitely my back ground), and achieving seen this from both edges of this fence i really do feel instead passionately it should!
Years back we utilized to the office in a really “CEng unfriendly” industry, and theoretically our products had been really revolutionary and never poorly engineered.